News · Search & AI Visibility

84% of what AI cites is not published by you: earned media decides what ChatGPT and Gemini say about your business

More than 84% of the sources cited by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity are earned media and third-party content, according to the Muck Rack study published on 28 October.

Paid content does not reach 1%, brand websites are gaining ground and journalism is losing it. I explain what the study measures, why each AI cites differently and what your business needs to do so that the sources AI reads talk about you.

By 8 min read
WHERE DOES AI CITE FROM? · SEP 202684%+of citations: earned andthird-party sources, not adsThird-party corporate25.1%▲Journalism22%▼Aggregators, encyclopaedias18.3%▲Brand websites (owned)15.2%▲Government and NGOs9.6%▲Paid content0.3%May 2026Source: Muck Rack, 28-10-2026

Short answer

What does Muck Rack’s study say about AI sources?

Short answer

The October 2026 edition of “What Is AI Reading?”, by Muck Rack and Generative Pulse, concludes that:

  • More than 84% of AI citations are earned and third-party sources.
  • Only 0.3% is paid or advertorial content.
  • Brand websites rose from 13.7% to 15.2% between May and September.

It is the fourth edition of the study, and the earned share has stayed between 82% and 89% since 2025. This is not a one-quarter trend.

+40M

AI answers analysed in 2026, with 207 million citations

Generative Pulse

1,020

unbranded consumer prompts in the September sample

Muck Rack, October 2026

212

domains cited by all four engines at once in September

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity

Definition

What is earned media, and why does AI prefer it?

Earned media is the visibility you get without paying for it and without publishing it yourself: what others say about you. The earned media definition is clearest when you compare it with the other two types:

Owned, paid and earned media in AI answers (September 2026)
CriterionWhat it isExamplesShare of citations
Owned mediaYour own channelsYour website, your blog, your product pages15.2%
Paid mediaWhat you pay forAds, sponsored articles, advertorials0.3%
Earned media and third partiesWhat others publish about you or your sectorPress, comparisons, reviews, directories, public bodies, encyclopaediasMore than 84%

The owned, earned and paid media split has never mattered more. Why does AI prefer earned? Because it needs to back its answer with something other than the brand’s own opinion. What a company says about itself is fine for describing its products; to recommend it over others, AI looks to third parties.

One figure illustrates it well: in ChatGPT’s Forbes citations, editorial articles beat those of its paid programme, Forbes Councils, by 1.7 to 1. Even on the same outlet, what is paid for counts for less.

The data

Where do AI engines cite from? What changed from May to September

Within earned and third-party sources, not everything moves the same way:

Share of each source type in AI citations (Muck Rack, 2026)
CriterionMaySeptemberTrend
Third-party corporate content24%25.1%Up
Journalism27%22%Down: the biggest change in the study
Aggregators and encyclopaedias17.4%18.3%Up
Brand websites (owned)13.7%15.2%Up
Government and NGOs8.6%9.6%Up
Academic research4%4.4%Up
Paid content0.3%0.3%Flat

The fall in journalism is the news. It had held between 25% and 27% since July 2025 and dropped to 22% in September. In ChatGPT, it went from 28.1% in January to 22%, and several major publishers almost vanished from its citations even though they allowed its crawler.

AI’s sources are changing, but communicators are still the ones best positioned to lead on GEO.

Greg Galant, co-founder and CEO of Muck Rack · Muck Rack

Engines

Each AI cites in its own way, and changes from one run to the next

The study repeated the same question twice on the same day. The result explains why a one-off check is worthless:

Domains repeated when the same question is asked twice on the same day
CriterionDomains repeatedWhat it means
ChatGPT41%More than half its sources change from one answer to the next
Gemini45%Similar to ChatGPT
Perplexity94%Very stable: it almost always cites the same sources

And another figure not to overlook: 81% of the major publishers blocking Claude’s search crawler received almost no citations from Claude. Among those that allowed it, the figure was just 12%.

Blocking has a price

If your website blocks an AI’s search crawler, that AI will hardly cite you. Check your robots.txt with the guide to robots.txt for AI: the crawler that searches is not the one that trains.

Global data

The study uses Generative Pulse’s global data and unbranded consumer prompts. It gives no figures by country: use it as direction for your strategy, not as an exact measure.

Impact

What does it mean for your business?

Your reputation on third-party sitesHigh impact

What AI says about you comes mainly from what others publish. If nobody outside your website talks about you, AI has little reason to recommend you.

Your sponsored content budgetHigh impact

Advertorials are hardly ever cited: 0.3%. If you pay for articles to appear in AI, you are paying for something AI barely reads.

Your websiteMedium impact

Brand websites are gaining ground, especially for product and how-to questions. Your product pages and guides need to answer well.

Your press relationsMedium impact

Journalism is losing ground, but it is still more than one in five citations. And third-party corporate content is rising: comparisons, partners, directories.

Your measurementMedium impact

With sources that change from one answer to the next, measuring with a single question gives false data. You need a fixed panel, repeated every month.

Plan

What to do now: an earned media strategy for AI in five steps

An earned media strategy aimed at AI follows this order:

  1. Ask AI which sources it cites in your sector

    Put your customer’s questions to ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity and note the websites they cite. That list is your map of media, directories and comparisons to reach.
  2. Review what they already say about you

    Trade directories, reviews, LinkedIn, Wikipedia if relevant. If the information is outdated or wrong, AI will repeat it.
  3. Give the press something to report

    Your own data, a small study of your sector, a real case with figures. That is what turns a press release into an article AI can cite.
  4. Get into comparisons and lists

    Third-party corporate content rises to 25.1%: supplier comparisons, partner websites, trade associations. Ask to be where your category is already being compared.
  5. Do not buy mentions

    Paid content is cited 0.3% of the time, and Google warns in its guide that manufactured mentions are less useful than they seem. A few real mentions beat many bought ones.

How this fits with your website, and how to measure it, is in the guide to AI visibility.

Key points

  • More than 84% of what AI cites is earned media and third-party content; paid content, 0.3%.
  • Brand websites rise to 15.2% of citations and journalism falls from 27% to 22%.
  • ChatGPT and Gemini repeat fewer than half of their sources from one answer to the next.
  • For AI to recommend you, you need others to talk about you, not ads or bought mentions.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions about earned media and AI

What is earned media?

Earned media is the visibility a brand gets without paying for it and without publishing it itself: press coverage, mentions on blogs, reviews, comparisons, interviews or third-party recommendations. It differs from owned media, your own channels such as your website, and from paid media, which is advertising.

What does Muck Rack’s October 2026 study say?

That more than 84% of what ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity cite comes from earned and third-party sources, that paid content is just 0.3%, and that brands’ own websites rise to 15.2%. Also that journalism fell from 27% to 22% of citations between May and September 2026. It analyses more than 40 million AI answers from 2026.

Can I pay to have AI cite my business?

Not in organic answers. According to Muck Rack, paid or advertorial content is 0.3% of citations, unchanged since May. You can buy ads in ChatGPT or on Google, which are labelled as advertising, but sponsored articles are hardly ever cited. In ChatGPT’s Forbes citations, editorial content beats the paid programme by 1.7 to 1.

Is my website still useful if AI mostly cites third parties?

Yes. Brand websites made up 15.2% of citations in September 2026, more than in May, and they matter more for product and how-to questions. Your website needs to answer those questions well. But for AI to recommend you over your competitors, you need others to talk about you.

Why does AI cite different sources each time?

Because each answer is generated afresh. When the same question was asked twice on the same day, ChatGPT repeated 41% of the domains it cited, Gemini 45% and Perplexity 94%. So to find out whether you are cited, ask each question several times and compare trends, not one-off answers.

Does blocking an AI crawler affect citations?

A great deal. In the study, 81% of major publishers blocking Claude’s search crawler received almost no citations from Claude, compared with 12% of those that allowed it. If you want an AI to cite you, let its search crawler in, which is different from the one it uses to train models.

References

Sources

Accessed and verified on 29 October 2026.

This article was created with the help of AI and reviewed by José Galán. I take great care over every post and every translation, but the odd mistake can still slip through. If you find one, write to me: you will be helping me improve.

Search & AI Visibility

Which sources does AI use to talk about you? Check it for free.

The AI visibility checker reviews whether ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity can read your website and tells you what to fix first so they cite you.

Run the free check

Reviewed by

Agent-as-a-Service Designer at AllHub and Search & AI Visibility consultant. I design internal AI agents and help companies show up in Google and AI engines, with reproducible measurement.

LinkedInBackground

Shall we talk?

Get recommended by AI and/or put an agent to work for you.

Tell me what you want to achieve: fill in the form or email me at info@josegalan.dev.

We go through your AI visibility snapshot (or the process you want to automate) and I tell you, with data, what I would change first. No commitment.

What are you interested in?
Company size (optional)
When would you like to start? (optional)

Basic data protection information. Controller: José Galán. Purpose: to reply to your enquiry. Legal basis: your consent, which you can withdraw at any time. Recipients: no data is shared with third parties unless required by law; Google (hosting and form delivery) acts as data processor. Your rights: access, rectification, erasure, objection, restriction and portability. More information in the privacy policy.